The Widdershins

Activist Monday: WWRD (What Will Republicans Do) in 2016?

Posted on: January 11, 2016

Strange days indeed

Good Monday, everyone. Today I’d like you to remember our PUMA roots. Remember when we were all trying to figure out what we would do if Obama were the nominee in 2008, and not Hillary? Would we stay home? Would we vote Republican or third-party in protest? Would we suck it up and vote the party line anyway? And then, after the election, we wondered if we should start our own Party, since the Democrats tanked our candidate and told many of us that our primary votes only counted as “half.” (Some counted as “none.”) Our dissatisfaction with the Party drove some of us to re-register as Green or Working Families, and a few of us (no one who comments or blogs here anymore) to give in to the Dark Side.

Well, it’s 2015, just a few weeks before the first caucuses in Iowa and New Hampshire, and Tea Party types are taking a page from our book. If we hadn’t done it first, they’d be screaming “Party Unity My Ass” at every “anti-establishment” rally.

Never have so many voters been attracted to Republican candidates like Donald J. Trump and Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, who are challenging core party beliefs on the economy and national security and new goals like winning over Hispanics through immigration reform. Rank-and-file conservatives, after decades of deferring to party elites, are trying to stage what is effectively a people’s coup by selecting a standard-bearer who is not the preferred candidate of wealthy donors and elected officials.

And many of those traditional power brokers, in turn, are deeply uncomfortable and even hostile to Mr. Trump and Mr. Cruz: Between them, the leading candidates do not have the backing of a single senator or governor.

“I haven’t seen this large of a division in my career,” said Senator John McCain, the Arizona Republican first elected to Congress in 1982. “You probably have to go back to Ford versus Reagan in 1976. But that was only two people.”

Yes, the Republican party base is not just revolting, but is fomenting a full-blown revolution. Now, I want to make it clear that I am not comparing their beliefs and values with those of us here. Original PUMAs were liberal to moderate Democrats who didn’t see Obama as representing Democratic values, while the base values of those who support Trump bear a striking resemblance to those of the German National Socialist Party in 1933. I am simply pointing out that the questions they’re asking are the same: what will we do if our guy, who lacks national Party support, isn’t the nominee?

But political analysts have taken this question a step further, wondering: What happens if Trump or Cruz wins the nomination? One possible scenario: A third-party challenge to the Tea Party candidate, from within the GOP establishment. It would be irresponsible NOT to speculate!

With Trump as the nominee, the Republican Party would face a threat to unity on several fronts. His victory would represent a triumph of an insurgent movement, or impulse, within the party. Historically speaking, this is exactly the kind of intraparty victory that guarantees political civil war.

[snip]

Would a Trump nomination be another example of such a power shift? Yes, although not a shift in an ideological sense. It would represent a more radical kind of shift, with power moving from party officials and office-holders to deeply alienated voters and to their media tribunes. (Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham have not exactly endorsed Trump, but they have been vocal in defending him and in assailing those who have branded Trump unacceptable.) It would undermine the thesis of a highly influential book, “The Party Decides,” which argues that the preferences of party insiders is still critical to the outcome of a nomination contest. This possibility, in turn, has provoked strong feelings about Trump from some “old school” Republicans. Says one self-described “structural, sycophantic Republican” who has been involved at high levels of GOP campaigns for decades: “Hillary would be bad for the country—he’d be worse.”

The idea behind running a more “traditional” Republican would be to 1) Save the Party from being associated with Trump in upcoming Congressional elections, and 2) give Republicans who don’t support Trump an alternative to either staying home, or voting for Hillary. This strategy would almost certainly lead to a Clinton victory in the short term, but might save the Senate from turning over to the Democrats, as well as giving the RNC credibility when it distances itself permanently from its former base.

Yes, I said “when.” As we at TW have pointed out many times, the beliefs of the GOP base are no longer based in anything resembling reality, and their goals cannot be met without radically changing the structure and core legal basis (the Constitution) of our country.  This giant gap between the “movement conservatives” and the GOP establishment can no longer be ignored; the rise of Republican demagogues like Trump have proven this beyond a shadow of a doubt. If the Party wants to become more friendly to Hispanics and young people, it needs to jettison the openly xenophobic and sexist views that Trump and Cruz have been pushing. Leading Republicans such as one of our Widdershinian favorites, Lindsey “Ah feel faint” Graham, have admitted as much.

So, WWRD in 2016? Well, first of all, they’ll lose the general election no matter what. A house divided against itself cannot stand. What I’m hoping, though, is that the RNC will finally have to confront the ideological extremism of the Republican base and take action to neutralize it. That can only be a good thing for this country as a whole.

This is an open thread.

Advertisements

15 Responses to "Activist Monday: WWRD (What Will Republicans Do) in 2016?"

Oh, those revolting Republicans!

Excellent post, MB! Its been bizarre seeing the GOP splinter and change from how I remember them in my young years. The democrats look amazing by comparison, CDS notwithstanding. Let the nutters run two candidates. The happy thought I take from this is that we’ll win!

MB, I hope its ok if I post this song under this post. With the subject matter of the right wing implosion, and David. Bowie’s passing, it seems appropriate:

I’m looking at the weirdest thing. Some of you remember I posted Pantone’s “color of the year” over the weekend, which is rose crystal and a pale blue called “serenity”? Well, I’m typing on my macbook and when I look at the bar at the top of the window where you type in the url or search query, that area is surrounded by a blending of those two colors!?! I knew that the Pantone color of the year thing was making headway (Sephora always puts out lipstick, eyeshadow and blush in whatever color they choose as a silly marketing thing–and yes, they now have two lipsticks in rose quartz and blue), but I didn’t expect to see Pantone’s choices on the inside of my computer. How zen of mac!

This depresses the hell out of me; although, it won’t matter for us since hubbie is retiring from his school district job this year and our kid is grown:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/supreme-court-public-unions_5693ed2ee4b0a2b6fb70e579

If you’re a republican teacher and you hate unions, work for a private school. No one is forcing you to be a teacher, and no one is forcing you to work in a unionized workplace. Go work in Texas, where you can make low wages, not have great insurance and lots of paid days off, and teach kids that the earth is only 6,000 years old.

Chat & Fredster, are you guys watching tonights game?

annie@5: Oh yes I’m watching. Go Clemson Tigers!

Haven’t been around much today because yesterday evening when I was getting bags out of the suv I reached over for a bag and that little funny movement twinged my back. Arrggghh! After I put things away I took a hot shower and used the massager setting on the shower head and let it beat on my back. Then I took a Flexeril and called it a night. Also, the #^&^*^@# wireless was acting up so that frustrated me too. 👿

@5: I’m watching too.

This Repub field is so bizarre I can’t imagine what anyone who just can’t vote for Trump or Cruz will do. Maybe vote for Christie even if they don’t like him? Those voters who have finally realized the Rs have done nothing for them are blaming it on the “establishment”- as if these fruitcakes will actually deliver what they promise either. It hasn’t sunk in that the real problem is they are voting for the wrong PARTY.

I don’t think anyone of them will ever vote third party. Hillary will get crossover votes from a Trump/Cruz choice, but with Hillary on the ticket they will come out in droves to vote against her no matter who it is. Can you imagine these guys VP picks? Fresh hell.

Did anyone watch Morning Schmoe this morning (well yesterday morning now)? Joe told his groupies there that “insiders” had told him that if Hillary loses IW and NH that the party was talking about bringing in Joe Biden or John Kerry with a possible VP of Elizabeth Warren. Everyone just gasped. He said “I’m just telling you what I heard.” That idiot was serious. Schmuck.

This whole article is good about the tea party/freedom caucus. Especially what Devin Nunes (R Calif) has to say about how far right wing media is spreading lies and turning these voters into all out conspiracy theorists. Now these people are turning against them for promising the impossible.(I don’t know how to “snip” those paragraphs into the post)

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/12/14/a-house-divided

@11, how did I miss this? Murdoch divorced Wendi Deng when she was having an affair with Tony Blair? How did I miss that?

http://www.vanityfair.com/style/2014/03/wendi-deng-note-tony-blair

MB, great post and you perfectly point out the terminal foibles of the Republicans. They are like dying houseplants. They need to be pulled up by their roots and have their roots pruned. They need to repot themselves. Of course, they are going to resist until they have sacrificed the last poor person, immigrant, gay person, or woman trying to access reproductive health care.

For Republicans, charting their course forward isn’t so much difficult, as it is inconvenient.

@12: You snooze, you lose.

Comments are closed.

Keep Up

Atrocities Documented:

What the F*ck Just Happened?!

Victories Won:

Your Victories Against Drumpf!

Wanna Be A Widdershin?

Send us a sample post at:

widdershinssubmissions at gmail dot com

Our Front-Pagers

I’m ready. Are you?

Comments

DYB on Whaddah Week!
DYB on Whaddah Week!
Prolix on Whaddah Week!
NW Luna on Whaddah Week!
NW Luna on Whaddah Week!

Blog Archive

January 2016
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Our 2016 Ticket!

Our girl is gonna shine

Busted: Glass ceiling

HRC bumper sticker

She’s thinking “Less than 2 weeks I have to keep seeing that face”

Yeah I can make it

The team we’re on

Women’s March on Washington!

Right-click the pic for more info

Kellyanne Conway’s new job