The Widdershins

Mountains? Water? Happy…

Posted on: October 18, 2013

Good afternoon Widdershinners.  Since the world failed to implode on Wednesday evening and the House of Representatives are yet again on vacation anxiously awaiting their transport to the planet Tatooine, it’s a pretty good Friday.  Here’s hoping yours is a great one.

Before my parents became ill, I was involved in some pretty interesting research on happiness.  Not to worry, there were smart people designing and carrying out the research.  I was around for the purpose of lowering the collective I.Q. which I’m proud to say I carried out to great success.

Most of you might be familiar with the World Happiness Report conducted by the U.N.’s Sustainable Development World Happiness ReportInitiative.  It is quite helpful in providing a comparative basis upon which to compare countries at a macro level, but at a micro level it lacked actionability.  The reason is for over half the world’s population, the greatest drivers of happiness are directly related to having enough food and clean water.  Don’t get me wrong, that is important comparative data, but international mobility to change personal circumstance isn’t available to the vast majority of the world’s citizens.

So our research was focused at a more actionable level — the community.  Even in the first world residency is a considered proposition — people just don’t pick up and move their families on a whim.  In beginning the research, we thought it important to look at those things engaging people in their communities and thus, making them happy.  Our research then allowed us to compare “like communities in the same country” to measure engagement and happiness at the intra-country level.  This is an oversimplified explanation and it doesn’t do justice to the research, but that was the crux of the project.

We found some very interesting things.  Of course, economic factors and corruption-free government were highly correlative to engagement and happiness at the community level, but there were other more interesting ethereal aspects of happiness.

For instance, if you can see mountains or a large body of water everyday, you are more likely to be happy.  If your community has institutions like a university, a library, a museum, or even a zoo, you are more likely to be happy.  If your air and water supply are deemed to be pure, you are more likely to be happy.  The ratio of population to churches, schools, and parks were important indices.  The lower the ratio, the more likely you are to be happy.

Happy Road SignThese are all interesting, but there was another characteristic I found most fascinating since it cut across all the other physical indicators.  That characteristic was altruism.  How the community saw itself when it came to charity was hugely important when it came to happiness and engagement within the community.

Think about that for a second.  If a community saw itself fulfilling the social contract with those in need, the people affording the charitable selflessness were happier.  At the community level, happiness emanated from taking care of those having less.  That fact excites me to no end and gives me an abiding hope for the future.

For years now we have lost sight of that kind of positivity.  We have certainly lost sight of it during the last few weeks.

Last Friday I wrote about the “fear” of those in the Tea Party who felt they were “losing their America.”  Tuesday I wrote about the lack of empathy endemic to a country becoming more and more stratified by income disparity.  Today, I want to tie these threads into a nice positive bundle to send us off on a good note for the weekend.

As humans, we have an inborn, ingrained predilection to seek happiness.  Being inveterate social creatures, we generally want to be around happy people.  Doing good things for those who are in need makes us feel better about ourselves — it makes us happier.  As a people, we always gravitate to a future painted warm by happiness.

What we have seen in the last three weeks, and in general over the past decade or so, is a wallowing in just about everything leading to a lack of sustainable happiness.  The institution of government doesn’t seem to work because of obstructionism, women and children cut from the sustenance of WIC, seniors cut from Meals-on-Wheels, millions of needy proposed to be cut from food stamps, and the granddaddy of them all, a three-year political Texas cage match over access to health care.  Health care for goodness sakes!

Happy kitten interlude...just because I thought it was cute...

Happy kitten interlude…just because I thought it was cute…

In a death throe for a way forward, a fractious Republican Party has chosen a path that at its essence makes people feel hollowed out and unhappy.  The chosen path is one antithetical to how we want to see ourselves.  Let there be no doubt, this “I got mine, sorry about your luck” philosophy does enrage and activate a certain fifteen to twenty percent of the population, but according to the research, even those people will find no fulfillment from what they espouse.

Through fear, prompted by a super-wealthy class lacking in empathy, the Republican Party has cast their political lot.  The shortsightedness of this choice is exacerbated by its being centered around a dwindling age cohort of 65-plus.

The good news is remarkably simple:  Humans want to be happy.  Hurting people is the antithesis of the altruism we seek.  The lack of empathy will always be outweighed by the happiness charity provides.  And by its very nature, fear is transitory and must be constantly recharged as to be actionable — it is not a condition of emotional permanence.  It takes little insight to see the foolishness underpinning the GOP strategy.

What we have seen the last three weeks is the last gasp of unhappy people peddling totems of unhappiness for short-term political survival.  The target audience is a dwindling minority who, by their very nature, are looking for happiness.  This strategy is doomed by its essence and self-defeating in its execution.  It will soon pass.

It can’t help but not pass.

This weekend I hope you can see mountains or water or whatever else that makes you happy.  After these last few weeks, we all deserve it.

This is an open thread.


18 Responses to "Mountains? Water? Happy…"

I can personally validate your study results,. I am happiest near water or viewing mountains.

@1, emotional reactions validation by hard research are the bestest emotions.

Sorry about being late with inserting the pictures — given that Chrome isn’t talking to wordpress and vice versa, I have to scurry back and forth between IE and Chrome to do a post.

Very interesting post Prolix. I am always perplexed by the actions of those who want to cut, cut, cut when it comes to things like WIC, SNAP, etc. but then also profess their “Christian” beliefs. I don’t think Christ would be very happy with them.

@3: The Christian right has their own interpretation of “suffer the little children”,

chat@4: I’m sure they do, but WWJD?

I first visited the mountains of Wyoming when I was about 6. I always wanted to live there. I prefer mountains to water.

I think my greatest happiness in life came from various volunteer jobs I had helping others for no pay. I wish I was physically able to do things like that now. I still try to help other people as much as I can. Doing good makes everyone feel good.

@5, WWJD — What would John Boehner do?

@6, Beata that is exactly what the research told us. Reaching out to help others, while socially desirable at a facial level, is much more fulfilling to people irrespective of any financial consideration.

Here is an interesting corollary: Even if people aren’t doing the charity work themselves for whatever reason, if people know that someone within their community is doing it, they are happier than they would be otherwise. That is one good thing about giving recognition to charitable organizations — it literally lifts all the emotional boats in a community.

Prolix@7: No…what would Haysus do? Boehner would light up and have a cocktail of course!

Fitful sleeping last night…I need a nap. BBL

@9, Isn’t he that representative from the northern district of Mexico who so worries Gohmert.

Speaking of Gohmert — I was wearing the battery down in the remote the other evening. I stopped on Megyn Kelly to just see what her show was like. She had on Gohmert and Huelskamp from Kansas. Whoa doggie, that was a pair!

The screen was divided into 3 with blondelicious Megyn in the middle. Huelskamp ranted first, but in a reasonable noun and verb sorta way. Then Gohmert started — the clip where he says the shutdown was to sidetrack amnesty doesn’t do it justice — he ranted and ranted and ranted. It was like a training video for Tourette’s Syndrome. A complete word salad in a constant state of mindless tossing.

Megyn couldn’t break in, couldn’t get him to shut up, Huelskamp didn’t realize it was a split screen and his eyes were rolling. Finally, the producers had to cut it off and even with the screen blank Gohmert was still babbling and the last thing you can hear him say, “Love your show Megyn.”

I think Gohmert has grabbed that electrified border fence once too many times.

@10: Take it easy, Fredster. Rest up for a good weekend of football.

New Jersey has a Supreme Court that is fair equal and sane. Let freedom ring in New Jersey. 14 for Marriage Equality…Next is Illinois!

Prolix@9 (and I know you’ve already left, my bad) I truly wish we could have Louie Gohmert as a non-voting Congress critter. That way we could still get the comedic value w/out him doing any harm.

fuzzy said: <iNew Jersey has a Supreme Court that is fair equal and sane.

Oh?? Did they do something fuzzy?

Oh and fuzzy, have you had a chance to go into the dashboard and play around with the toys there yet?

Beata: I need to rest! Using the remote thingie can wear you out! 😆

Wow. What a beautiful post. I agree with all of it.

When the momster was in the n.h./rehab there were a couple of women from over on the regular n.h. side that I would see out at the smoking patio. Those ladies were there on medicaid and I think in Alabama they are allowed to have something like $30/mo for “personal needs”, snort! A couple of times one or another would ask me if I would mind picking up some little something for wasn’t much usually, but I’d try to get it for them and then refuse to take their money. It just didn’t seem fair.

Comments are closed.

Keep Up

Atrocities Documented:

What the F*ck Just Happened?!

Victories Won:

Your Victories Against Drumpf!

Wanna Be A Widdershin?

Send us a sample post at:

widdershinssubmissions at gmail dot com

Our Frontpagers

I’m ready. Are you?

Blog Archive

Kellyanne Conway’s new job

Take the kids to work? NO!

That moment when *your* pussy gets grabbed

You go gurl! h/t Adam Joseph

“The” Book

Nice picture of our gal

Time till the Grifter in Chief is Gone

Hopefully soonerJanuary 21st, 2021
2.3 years to go.

Mueller Time!

Wise Words from Paul Ryan


Only the *best* politicans bought by the NRA

Marching for their lives

Perfect Picture

Rudy: oh shit the pee tape IS real!

Need Reminders?

Never too early to shop for Christmas

“Look this way”

Manafort’s Jail Photo

Indeed who?

Trump spam

IOW Dumb = Happy?

Simply Put