The Widdershins

Anticipation…

Posted on: February 15, 2013

Morning Widdershin friends and here’s hoping in case you translated all your Valentines into Latin for the fun of it, they all contained future perfect verbs.

This is one of my 30,000 feet missives — don’t worry, we aren’t in a 787 Dreamliner with its noxious, smoking, recycled30,000 Feet Prius batteries — so sit back and relax.

State of the Union addresses are interesting to me. They are the one time a year when we put ruffles and flourishes on the tribal custom of coming around the campfire and listening to the elected leader tell us how we are doing and where we should hope to go in the coming year. Convening around the campfire, albeit now a teevee, is a custom as old as recorded time itself.

This year’s was another in a long line of SOTU laundry lists. For such a lauded speechifier as everyone tells us President Obama is, outside of giving the victims of gun violence the respect of a vote on gun safety, there wasn’t much oomph there. True to form, this year’s SOTU was another “at the margin of the margin” prescriptions along the lines of something Bush the Elder might have delivered.

There were some good things in the speech, but they were pilot projects of policy amuse bouches of what good things ought to be. There was a call for much-needed immigration reform everyone agrees needs to be done — done not because it is the right thing to do, but done because the pasty strategists of both parties believe it will make them competitive in future elections.

There was a call for a “phased-in” raise in the minimum wage to $9.00 an hour — too bad it isn’t a phase-out for the fact that the hourly minimum wage is worth 15% less than a 1968 hourly wage. There was a call for the Paycheck Fairness Act and for passage of the VAWA, but since somewhere it is written you can‘t make feet-draggers angry by publicly commenting on their dilatory tactics, they were just another two items on the laundry list.

But I digress, I don’t want this post to be a critique of the items in the speech, I want to use the speech as a springboard to look at one of the essential elements in leadership — visioning.

There is nothing more central to leadership than having a vision of what the future should look like. World-class effective leaders paint a picture of how the future will look — not in drab, lifeless tones, but in vivid, graphic, sensory-tingling mind pictures.

campfireVisioning is essentially the same talent as exhibited by the tribal campfire’s most effective storytellers. The successful storytellers were the ones who could make you see and feel and smell and taste what the future would look like. You would find yourself wanting to go there with the storyteller — be glad to go there with the storyteller — eager to follow the storyteller.

The effective leader sees the future and he/she has a vision of what that future is. This simple concept tells the “how” of the process, but it doesn’t tell the “why” of the process and I find that the most intriguing part of this transformational synergy.

Dr. Daniel Kahneman, the Nobel winner and father of behavioral economics, and someone with whom I’ve been fortunate enough to spend time, explains the internal cognitive process like this:

We don’t choose between experiences, we choose between memories of experiences. Even when we think about the future, we don’t think of our future normally as experiences. We think of our future as anticipated memories.

To analogize, a great speech is not some grocery shopping list, but the collective anticipated memory of a family gathering around the table where the food is an afterthought. Painting the picture of where we anticipate we want to be is much more important than mere step-by-step directions. Telling us how to get there isn’t nearly as important as what we anticipate to remember of our trip.  It’s not the flour, eggs, and sugar of the recipe, it is the celebration around the cake.

That is an essential element of leadership — it isn’t a performance filled with platitudes, it is the shared collective ethos of where we want to be. This is how leadership molds public opinion and can ride the crest of polling numbers. It is how you raise the dialogue above the mire of tactics to the sublime of a clarion collective public desire.

If you will indulge me over the next couple of weeks, I’d like to do some visioning about what’s over the horizon and what we are “not” hearing from our leaders. There won’t be many answers, but I promise there will be lots of questions upon which we can collectively chew.

This is an “all skate” open thread.

About these ads

27 Responses to "Anticipation…"

Envision this: the “family” sitting around the table talking about a “vision” of having a clean house but it requires everybody pitching in.

The same analogy can be applied to the SOTU address which calls for each participant to set aside their differences and work for the common good. Ain’t going to happen.

Whatever Obama calls for by way of setting a new course is bound to be opposed no matter how big or small the issue by the GOP.

Minimum wage? Forget about it. Gun control? Forget about it. Climate change? Forget about it. Healthcare access? Forget about it. Chuck Hagel? Forget about it. Infrastucture? Forget about it. The list goes on.

You can describe a vision but it takes cooperation and cooperation is not going to happen in this current atmosphere. With all the issues facing the nation congress is on another “recess”. How much is expected to get done when the congressional calendar is set for a mere 126 days of required attendance?

Like the home that needs cleaning, the trash piles up, the windows need washing, the lawn turns into a jungle, and the unwashed curtains begin to sag.

This is our congress today: disinterested, distracted, dysfunctional.

The house and the nation are suffering from neglect because, quite frankly, nobody gives a damn.

I prefer my Valentines in the present pluperfect myself….

Did you see this? Holy crap on a stick!

http://gizmodo.com/5984476/meteorite-explodes-over-russia-panic-spreads-updating-live

(Salty language in Russian.)

And, Elizabeth Warren kicks a little ass.

post.com/2013/02/14/elizabeth-warren-bank-regulators_n_2688998.html?ir=Politics

GO Elizabeth Warren!

Hey Prolix, this is always what I miss with regard to Obama, and in fact, most of our Presidents post-JFK (even to some extent Bill Clinton). I don’t think a SOTU speech needs to take obstructive behavior into account. It needs to present a vision of how America SHOULD work. Obama’s famous 2004 speech did present that vision, and that’s why people were so compelled by it.

I have spent a couple of days this week going through people management training, and this is something we touched on. Get the team to understand what we are all working towards, and buy into it. I think Americans COULD be united around many issues, but of course, these are the issues that the 1% want us to be divided on. IE, building up our social safety net instead of destroying it, government job creation, equal rights for women and LGBT…you get the idea.

Bottom line is, I think that the omission of a shared vision is intentional. For decades, our leaders have pursued a “divide and conquer” strategy, which is the only thing that has been keeping the two parties relevant, and the voters rooting for one team versus the other.

Am I a bad person for not having much interest in what is happening in this nation?

It will take a complete overhaul of the present members for anything to get done and from the looks of the present membership that is not going to happen anytime soon.

With so many ignorant Tea Party candidates either serving or waiting in the wings this nation is on the brink of becoming a nation of “the rich and the rest of us” while everything we ever upheld is going down the tubes.

I am sick of watching John McCain putting in his obsolete two cents and Harry Reid capitulating to the whims of the morons.

Nothing much is going to happen in my lifetime and I really don’t want to pretend that it will.

Rather read a good book or lunch with friends than to believe that this is how a government works. It doesn’t and it won’t for a long, long time.

#6: I see a flaw in your argument.

For those who refuse to go along. or who fail to measure up to this “shared vision”, one can be fired and lose their jobs as a result.

Not so in congress. If you are from a “safe district” you can sit on your hands forever and not fear losing your seat. I give you Michele Bachmann as one example of a complete moron voted back into office.

In private industries the “bottom line” is a call to service. Rewards are given to those who follow the “vision” set out by leadership. Sit on your hands at your own peril because there is a consequence for that behavior.

In DC we watch the same obstructionists returning cycle after cycle only to be rewarded for doing nothing to serve for their lack of involvement.

Herman Cain is the new commentator on Fox.

Sorry for being late to the party, but the old puter decided to be cantankerous today by both downloading updates and then upchucking them and then trying to download, then upchucking…you get the routine.

Pat, everything you say is true about the effects of lacking a shared vision, but they are just that — effects. In leadership, visioning leap frogs over the dilettantes and corrals them in a defensive, obstructionist mode for everyone to see.

MB, I’m totally with you about not seeing shared vision since JFK — that is why there is such a thirst for it and you are so right, the 2004 Obama speech just whetted the appetite we all have for a shared vision. Since 2004, he’s been sorely lacking in keying into this aspect in his speechifying — if there was only someone who could tell him to excise “me,” “my,” “I,” and every other first person, non-collective reference, he would be about half way there.

In transformational leadership, visioning provides an ascendancy over the heads of the obstructionists — it raises the dialogue above the heads of those who revel in wallowing in the hog lot of political tactics. It also accelerates the desire for a “better tomorrow,” thereby de-emphasizing the pedantic tactics of the naysayers.

I know I sound either high or pie-eyed, but throughout history you can map cultural strides to this very issue. I really hope I’m not sounding haughty by writing about this stuff because it may not interest everyone.

@10 — DYB — Herman Cain on Fox — Sarah Palin in black face drag — so wrong on so many fronts.

Scott Brown is headed for Fox as well.

I have earned my status as an old grouch: nothing wrong with the word ‘envision,’ nor the phrase ‘to make an analogy.’ (Yes, I have been a copy editor in my time.) Visioning: a group I belong to did that recently for several months; they did without me. Now if they ever envision something worthwhile, I’ll be glad to join in.

Although I rarely comment on your country’s politics, Prolix you summed it up nicely and I look forward to your next installments.
Madamab is right in trying to get everyone to work together, as is Pat. I worked as a project manager for many years. Getting all the parties together to agree on something so trivial as critical path was difficult and working towards a solution once the critical path was signed off was even worse. The budgetary proposals were all off base, the problems that had never been considered even worse. Today, many years later I am amazed that we were ever able to install the most effective data communications network and even that – today is outdated. There was no vision, it was all about immediate returns – profit in other words. That is why telecommunications rates are so high, because there was no vision and people are now paying for that lack of vision. That plus telecom was a cash cow destined to be endlessly milked for more cash. Seems to me that most governments operate on the same program. Visionary not allowed. Eternal rewards for incompetence – A-okay. I doubt that Obama is a visionary. He’s a bait and switch con man. I hope what he mentioned in that SOTU will happen, but I highly doubt it. He’s building a case for his best selling memoirs.

Wonderful piece Prolix, and just think: You already have your topics laid out for yourself for your weekly post. :-)

Does anyone remember the spousal or child phrase “you’re going if I have to drag you there myself.”? Presidents (like LBJ) used to be able to say that to recalcitrant legislators, say, by killing a piece of pork that a congress critter wanted for his or her district or some other items that critter wanted. Of course LBJ had to have the cooperation of the House and Senate leaders to do so and he frequently did but that could not happen today. It seems there is no way to “trade” with today’s cong.critters. It seems as if they pride themselves on their supposed independence of the President. For example, I’m sure Obama would like to have something to trade with Lady Lindsey™ to get his Sec. Def confirmed. Something like oh…maybe removing the hidden cameras from his favorite tea room. ;-)

Good grief! Going from bad to worse!

@17 — Fredster, there will come a day, very soon, when we will wish for the rather lazy, hazy, sanguine days of Lady Lindsay cutting his monkey shines.

I’m probably repeating myself here, but Ted Cruz is dangerous — he’s a 21st Century McCarthy. As odious and putrid as Jim DeMinted was, no one liked him, not even his fellow Repubs, he was seen as mean, cold, self-serving, just a human pustule of ambulatory bile — when off the record, Republican senators were asked about Ted Cruz, their response:

“He’s Jim DeMint without the charm.”

If Ted Cruz, Darrell Issa, Paul Broun, and Steve King are available, JJ Abrams has a good start on the bar scene for the new “Star Wars.”

Nuff said.

Prolix@19: Well I was using Graham as an example. Don’t know anything about Cruz but guess I should read up on him now. I keep saying this but “it seems” that in the day, when a party had an asshole member in the Congress they could relegate them to the back bench and keep them from making mischief. The “leadership” of the party would make sure they didn’t act up too much. Guess those days are gone now. :-(

Off topic but….some good news for our “guv” in Louisiana.

http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/02/jindal_approval_rating_sees_ma.html#incart_river_default

Which may have been part of the reason lil Booby looked like this in a rare state media interview.

Remembering the past; envisioning the future.

@22 — Fredster, this behavior pattern of Ted Cruz isn’t a new thing. I started watching him last August when it looked liked he was going to win. In 2000, when Dana Milbank was doing a story about the Dubya campaign, Milbank went to Texas to interview various people in the campaign. When he got there, all the uppity ups in the campaign ran like roaches under a sun lamp except, except, wait for it — a young guy who was waving his hand and saying, “Pick me, pick me — talk to me!” That guy — Ted Cruz.

Here are the first two paragraphs:

During the 2000 presidential campaign, I went to Austin to profile the whippersnappers on George W. Bush’s team. Bush headquarters was full of young talent, but one man surprised me with his blatant audition to be featured in my article.

This eager staffer told me about how at Princeton he was the nation’s top debater, about his Supreme Court clerkship and his time on the Harvard Law Review, and about his well-placed connections. When I mentioned this self-promotional effort to a senior Bush adviser, I received a knowing eye-roll in response, and I decided to focus my profile on somebody else.

Perhaps I should have listened to the ambitious fellow: His name was R. Ted Cruz, and he is now a shoo-in to be the next U.S. senator from Texas.

The rest of the article is here:

http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-08-14/opinions/35493861_1_tea-party-cruz-paul-ryan

Prolix: There were two other articles on him at that Ruth Marcus piece and also about 2:a.m. this morning I was watching a repeat of Hardball and Tweety was comparing him to McCarthy…appropriately so it seems from the clips Tweety ran.

Prolix @24
He was really disturbing to watch. He obviously couldn’t give two shits about America (or reality), he was just looking to be noticed. Republicans are so easily duped by someone with a good vocabulary who knows how to speak in full sentences (for example, Cheney, Ryan), that they don’t even care if those people are lying sacks of shit, hell bent on raping and destroying this country. The thing is, they probably don’t agree with Cruz, but just enjoy all the zings at Democrats. So much for elevated political discourse.

Oh, and Cruz is one of the 22.

Fredster @25
I detest Tweety and would have considered the McCarthy comparison excessive until he started rolling McCarthy footage. The shoe fits.

SophieCT@26: I know Tweety is very prone to hyperbole, but like you, when I saw that film I thought yes indeed. I’m willing to bet that Cruz will consider it a badge of honor.

Comments are closed.

Wanna Be A Widdershin?

Send us a sample post at:

widdershinssubmissions at gmail dot com

Our Front-Pagers

Twittershins

I’m ready. Are you?

Are You…Too Left/Liberal For Obama?

Blog Archive

February 2013
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728  
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 162 other followers

%d bloggers like this: