Colette, where’s my swooning couch…
Posted on: June 29, 2012
- In: 2012 Election | Healthcare | Media Tripe | Politics | SCOTUS | Uncategorized
- 47 Comments
Morning Widdershin friends — here’s hoping your Friday is a great one!
To be honest, I’m just a little hacked off today. Since prayer hasn’t seemed to replenish my ever thinning pate of mouse fur hair that people charitably refer to as, well, “mouse fur,” yesterday I was watching the teevee machine and I was tuned into that intriguing infomercial “Alyssa Milano Uses Wen Hair Care,” and after that the nice teevee man had promised me shocking, I’m telling you shocking, tips on reducing belly fat when all manner of healthcare broke out. If you are anything like me, I needed a swooning couch straight out a Colette novel before the battling bobbleheads were eight minutes into their coverage.
Here you had CNN and Fox who couldn’t break eggs on their collective faces fast enough by reporting and bannering “Healthcare Act Unconstitutional” based upon reporters who were actually standing out front of the Supreme Court moving their lips as they silently read. While MSNBC got it right, they cut away to some guy who had found a $20 crumbled up in an old leisure suit, registered his name as a website, and breathlessly began an audition to be hired as a Romney spokesmorman.
The real journalistic croque-en-bouche was CNN cutting to a reporter in a Stockton, California coffee shop talking to a bunch of 80-something dyspeptics about healthcare. These codgers had last been happy when they hadn’t soiled themselves the last time they’d broken wind — beyond that who knows when a smile had crossed their scowling faces. And you ask, “Why was CNN chatting up these guys before their coffee kicked in?” Best I can tell, CNN had a satellite truck and a reporter in Stockton with little to do because covering a municipal bankruptcy is akin to covering a Manitoba molasses race in the dead of winter.
So what’s any different here than any ordinary day’s news cycle — wait for it — wait for it — nothing, absolutely ze-freaking-ro nothing. We have entered the sweatbox of philosopher Leszek Kolakowski’s Law of Infinite Cornucopia, “There is never a shortage of arguments to support any doctrine one wants to believe for whatever reason.”
All this is bound up in the simplest of psychological constructs, we as humans want to belong to a group, therefore we engage in “motivated reasoning.” Motivated reasoning is a political science concept that basically says a person will refine any argument without regard to facts in order to conform to the shtick of one’s tribe. We can’t help it — we want to belong and therefore, we “go a little crazy,” but tell ourselves like the Matchbox Twenty song, “we aren’t crazy, we’re just a little unwell.”
This healthcare-apoloosa is a perfect example of motivated reasoning since just about everyone hates Obamacare, but confusingly upwards of even 80% of Republicans and Independents support major portions of the Act. Nope, I haven’t mis-typed or suddenly gone unwell — here’s a great article about what happens when people are asked about something they actually understand.
We have traveled a long and winding road to get where we are today. From President Nixon introducing employer mandated coverage in the late 60’s to the conservative Heritage Foundation coming up with the individual mandate in 1989 to the Clintons’ hybrid employer/employee plan in 1994 to the Affordable Care Act — it has been a tortured journey. A journey that is far from over, but a journey where we are coming to a fork in the road.
This year’s election will offer two directions — either continuing to hobble along the path of the Affordable Care Act or the reduction or elimination of healthcare to an estimated 50 million Americans by whatever “Repeal and Replace” turns out to be. The estimated fifty million is the product of eliminating 31 million people from gaining coverage through ACA and the additional 14-19 million who would lose coverage by the Romney Medicaid state block grant and cap proposal.
Healthcare is an issue, when stripped away of all the “motivated reasoning,” that is understandable and concise. Michael Cannon sums it up nicely — Cannon is the director of health-care policy at the conservative Cato Institute and has formed the Anti-Universal Coverage Club, whose members, “reject the idea that government should ensure that all individuals have health insurance.” Survival of the fittest is an argument after all — although it runs headlong into creationism, but I digress. Ezra Klein asks the question in this great article.
Of one thing I am sure, with insurance premiums having risen 100% in the last ten years, something has got to give.
America has been working this issue for almost 50 years — it’s time it was settled. As the silly season of political hyperbole gushes forth and will be beamed into our homes by the billions unleashed by Citizens United, we will get to watch all those who are following the admonition of Colette, “You will do foolish things, but do them with enthusiasm.”
This is an “all skate” open thread.
47 Responses to "Colette, where’s my swooning couch…"
It is quite clear to me where the GOP stands on the issue of healthcare.
They are for it before they are against it after they are for it but then not so much.
Oh, and anything that Obama proposes is a definite “no” even though it may be something they originally stood for but now oppose.
Clear as mud!
Another excellent post, Prolix. Bravo!
May I suggest we follow the advice of a great sage and philosopher, Yogi Berra, and take that fork in the road? Just be sure to wash it off before using.
Now, if you will excuse me, I’m having an attack of the post-SCOTUS decision vapors and need to lie down.
LOL, DYB! Proceed with caution.
We call it a fainting couch in these here parts. My grandmother had one.
DYB, I hope you can get your AC fixed quickly. This heat is dangerous.
It’s “only” 97 degrees here now, with a heat index of 110. The actual temp is expected to reach 105 again later today. Who knows what the heat index will be? No relief in sight. Oy.
HT, I don’t think Prolix is crazy. “Eccentric” would be a better word.
Prolix, do you enjoy taking your pet anteater for walks? Curious minds want to know.
@11 and 12 — LOL HT and Beata — Nope no Manitoba molasses winter races, but I did use a sled team of anteaters once to mush through the Yukon.
Y’all made me laugh — thanks.
As we watch the talking voodoo dolls who happen to have offices on Capitol Hill, there are a couple of fun facts to know and tell that I didn’t put into the post. Just for good measure I thought I would share them as ammunition to shoot down this baseless tripe that will undoubtedly be infesting our teevee machines on Sunday.
1. Healthcare is killing small business hiring. Biggest of all the lies I think — the ACA doesn’t affect any business that has less than 50 employees — why do you think they call them small businesses? For the record, that’s 96% of all the “small businesses” of which these little pinheaded voodoo dolls are whining. The truth of the matter is that the ACA will make it easier for individuals to get better, more cost effective coverage through the exchanges, thereby decreasing the costs for small businesses that currently provide insurance thus making it a good deal for everyone — better care, lower prices, and I’ll be to Dublin before ya.
2. The IRS will send black helicopters to air space near you if you don’t get insurance beginning in 2014. Lie, Lie, Lie — and this is a favorite of, as Chat calls him, the pre-cog prodigy, Marco Rubio. Fact: There is a specific provision in the ACA that says the IRS can’t levy against a taxpayer who fails to have insurance — meaning that the IRS can’t attach land or bank accounts. The IRS could take a refund or take someone to court to capture the “tax,” but let’s be realistic here — from a practical standpoint, there aren’t enough law schools in this quadrant of the galaxy to churn out that many attorneys.
@17: Sorry I didn’t answer you yesterday, Fredster. Yes, I have a working AC! To save money, I keep it set around 80 degrees which is a good temp for me. I’m doing okay. I have my SO and friends to take me to get groceries, etc. because I can’t drive. I’m very grateful for all my blessings.
@16: DYB, please keep us posted on this delicate AC operation. Don’t hurt yourself.
Fredster, nope didn’t get the link, but would be most happy to get it if you want to try again. Thanks.
Yes, you are right — Truman did talk about health care and I’m sure that FDR did too, but in his 13 years, there wasn’t much he didn’t talk about dragging the country out of the Depression. I see Truman’s foray a little differently from the other omnibus proposals since it was immediately post-war, veterans hitting the work force, and price controls on salaries and the like at the time. I started with Nixon because it was the first really “stand” alone proposal to address the problem. One of the things that is most interesting is that the current system of healthcare being bound up with employment comes directly out of the post-WWII era where there was competition for employees because of price controls. Hopefully, the ACA with the exchanges will begin to break the link between employment and healthcare — making portability the norm instead of the exception.
And as far as “belonging” — you are a large part of the Widdershin tribe — and we are far better for it.
@26 — Bobby needs to learn that it is now time to erase all the “talking points” for the dazed head-nodding tri-corner hat wearers. Purging all the data banks takes more than 24 hours for operating systems running on tea bags.
@27: But they were so perfect for each other!
@32 LOL — it has to do with the weight of your intellectual contribution.
Thanks!
@43: Orange Man’s lookin’ a bit peaked there. Good thing he has that social-eyed medcine from the gummit. Bless his heart.
Comments are closed.





June 29, 2012 at 8:54 am
Interesting. I had not considered the inherent Conservative conflict between the ambient theory of self-care with their absolute rejection of Darwinism.