The Widdershins

HE’S BAAAAAACK!

Posted on: June 18, 2012

Evil Santorum

I’m not scary looking, my hands always look like claws

That’s right folks, good ole Rick has emerged from the darkness,  uh his secret place, uh no..I guess he’s just been gathering his thoughts.  But now he has a plan and a new means of getting paid, I guess. After his rather lukewarm endorsement of Willard, I don’t think he ever figured he would be in the hunt for the veep candidate so he had to find something to occupy his time.  And now he’s found it.

Our little Ricky has gone and formed himself a 501(c)4 group called Patriot Voices.  You can go there and read about it yourself if you want, but I went there only to get the link.  Now, I was curious as to why he formed a 501(c)4 instead of what I’ve seen all the time which is a 501(c)3.  I always thought those were the gold standard when you wanted to go about founding or forming something.  Apparently though, not so much.  I did some checking on these things here so I could find the differences between them and there are some.

501(c)4s are tax-exempt non-profit organizations. More specifically, according to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), 501(c)(4)s are:

  • “civic leagues or organizations not organized for profit but operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare,
  • “or local associations of employees, the membership of which is limited to the employees of a designated person or persons in a particular municipality,
  • “and the net earnings of which are devoted exclusively to charitable, educational, or recreational purposes.”

Umm..okay, but that doesn’t seem to add up too well with what Santorum says it’s all about which is:
it will focus on the themes the former Pennsylvania senator stressed in his campaign: support for traditional families and the right-to-life movement; preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons; and restoring the nation’s manufacturing base.
Well don’t see anything especially civic “league-like” here but I get it that it can fit in with the social welfare stuff although I doubt Santorum wants to go anywhere near the term “social welfare”.  So maybe it’s got something to do with bullet #2 above:  limited to the employees of a designated person?  Hmmm…maybe.  This article says [it] “is being funded by Santorum’s biggest donors, including Foster Friess, a wealthy conservative contributor who backed Santorum in 2012″.  Well, there you go.  I think Foster Freiss has backed just about every Republican who was running for the nomination and who, by the way, thinks contributions to 501c(4)s should be able to be made privately.

But let’s see what else there may be about these 501c(4) things that makes the Republicans like them so much.  Going back to my link above I see:

  • 501(c)3s are limited in the amount of time and/or money they can put into lobbying.
  • 501(c)4s can do an unlimited amount of lobbying (but then become ineligible to receive federal monies like grants).

Well there ya go.  The c(4) thingies can spend tons of money buying uh influencing folks.  No wonder the Repubs like them so much.  Now sounding like a late night infomercial, WAIT!! THERE’S MORE!!!

You just knew there had to be another reason the Repubs like these 501(c)4′s now didn’t you?  And here it is:

  • 501(c)3s cannot in any way support or oppose anyone running for public office, though they may be involved in political campaigns by way of non-partisan public forums, voter registration drives, etc.
  • 501(c)4s can engage in political campaign activity, so long as this is consistent with the organization’s purpose and is not the organization’s primary activity.

Aha!  That’s the ticket!  Now the rules say is not the organization’s primary activity.  Now between you, me and the lamppost, I have a sneaky suspicion that that is exactly what the Republican 501(c)4s are doing, but I doubt you’ll see the IRS clamp down on them.  The Repubs will find a way to shell out a few bucks on something related to their being and it will be just enough to get them by the laws and regulations.

Mother Jones has an article on these groups and calls it “dark money” that is raised and spent.  As M.J. says:

Other dark-money groups tend to describe their missions in broad terms that are unlikely to raise an auditor’s eyebrows. But how they spend their money suggests their actual agendas.

So what does all of it have to do with lil Ricky Santorum?  Well he’s following in the footsteps of the current presumed Republican nominee.

In setting up a political action committee, Santorum is emulating the path taken by Romney himself in 2008. When Romney quit that campaign — he announced it at a C-PAC event in Washington — he endorsed John McCain, and campaigned hard for him after McCain secured the nomination. When McCain lost to Barack Obama, Romney kept on raising money, endorsing other Republican candidates, and gathering chits within the GOP during the 2010 midterms.

This is the model Santorum evidently will be attempting to follow, as some of his biggest financial backers believe that by emerging as the strongest conservative alternative to Romney, Santorum is well-positioned for 2016.

That sounds an awful lot like Santorum doesn’t think Romney will win but ya never know, and I don’t think those chits have an expiration date on them.

This is an open thread.

About these ads

30 Responses to "HE’S BAAAAAACK!"

It’s pretty obvious that Rick is planning a run in 2016 as the ” social conservative voice” of the Fanatical Fringe.

His surge toward the end of the primaries gave him the impetus to spend the next 4 years appearing before ultra conservative groups through speaking fees and public appearances that will keep him in the spotlight until the next election cycle. It was always pretty clear that he had no love for Mitt Romney and more than likely will not campaign on his behalf since that in itself would alienate those “Christian groups” who oppose Mormonism.

Having a few primary wins under his belt was enough to convince Rick’s ego to keep going and the next 4 years will serve as his platform.

Rick is not about to “go away” anytime soon and this “new leader of the PAC” will find him all over the map speaking out about “sin”.

Fox will more than likely find room for him somewhere on their schedule since they seem to have found space for Herman Cain to chime in now and then.

Let the lectures begin!

Pat, should Romney lose, and the various polls don’t have he and Obama *that* far apart, I can see Santorum running around for the next 4 years saying “I told you so” endlessly.

I suspect that there are segments of the GOP hoping for a Romney loss.

Those looking to run in 2016 are more than likely Christie, Ryan, and Rick himself. An Obama win will afford them the opportunity to snarl, growl, and ridicule, something that could not do with Romney as POTUS.

If he loses there will be few “broken hearts” in that party but a wide open door to present their case.

Romney is not liked anymore that McCain was in 2008, probably even less. A Romney loss will set the stage for the wannabe’s to strut out and be taken more seriously than if he wins.

This is what Ricky is banking on.

Into the rabbit hole we go……………

Santorum is the new Sarah Palin.

#5: But Santorum speaks with some measure of coherence.

She, on the other hand, has nary a clue about what she is saying unless it involves “Obama this, Obama that, Obama bad”.

He at least offers a clear message. Hers is muddled somewhere within a torrent of words badly in need of an ending.

Rick sees sin everywhere and is on a mission to eradicate it. Sarah sees money.

They do share one commonality: they are both a little nuts.

We will see who runs in 2016. I hope to Goddess Hillary does. She will wipe the floor with whackos like Ricky.

What is really sad is that there are people gullible enough to follow this idiot over the Cliffs of Insanity.

#7: Yup, since we have now given the Lunatic Fringe permission to represent us, not a big leap to suggest that we will see more of them in 2016.

Fredster, I’m coining a new Santorum postulate based upon the proposition that the more you know him, the scarier he gets. I would posit his self-awareness has a direct inverse relationship to his scariness, ergo the scarier he gets his self-awareness in another four years will dwindle to between slim and none.

I’m envisioning scenes from “The French Lieutenant’s Woman” with Santorum cloaked in a technicolor dream coat standing on a jetty in Lake Erie pining over the long lost love of Freiss and the Koch brothers Karamazov — he will lament why people have been given the burden of free will since he was around all along to tell them what to think and choose. Perhaps his 501(c)(4) can do a docudrama simply entitled, “Rick’s Sanitarium.”

He knows all the answers!

Pat said: But Santorum speaks with some measure of coherence.
Now that is scary!!

Prolix said:

I would posit his self-awareness has a direct inverse relationship to his scariness, ergo the scarier he gets his self-awareness in another four years will dwindle to between slim and none.

Hmmm…that leads to the possibility that he could end up wandering (in the desert?) mumbling and babling to himself alone?
What a perfect ending for him! :lol:

MB@7: If Hillary runs (please, please, please!) the Republicans should just concede and not run anybody.

I should have pointed out that among the 501(c)4s is the infamous Citizens United. If you can, read the article at M.J. Here is how they described C.U.:

Citizens United

What it is: Conservative nonprofit that sued the Federal Election Commission in 2008, resulting in the Supreme Court’s infamous Citizens United ruling.

Mission statement: “Citizens United is dedicated to restoring our government to citizens [sic] control. Through a combination of education, advocacy, and grass roots organization, the organization seeks to reassert the traditional American values of limited government, freedom of enterprises, strong families, and national sovereignty and security. The organization’s goal is to restore the founding fathers [sic] vision of a free nation, guided by honesty, common sense, and goodwill of its citizens.”

How it walks the line: Since its formation in 1988, the nonprofit has released 19 right-wing political documentaries, including films narrated by Newt Gingrich and Mike Huckabee, a rebuttal to Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11, and a pro-Ronald Reagan production (plus the upcoming Occupy Unmasked). On its 2010 tax filing, Citizens United reported spending more than half of its $15.2 million budget on “publications and film” and “advertising and promotion.”

Beata: the Dr. Caligari clip was perfect!

It’s not necessary for Santorum to have designs on 2016 to take this approach. He could merely be trying to clear his “soiled” name–y’know, working on his Google Problem. His candidacy helped quite a bit. After his campaign was over, the Spreading Santorum site was hit number 3. Today it’s around 10.

SophieCT: Welll…we’ll just have to get those numbers back up on the Spreading Santorum thing. ;-)

That picture – he looks like he’s straight off the lot of “The Night of the Living Dead”.
My condolences to all – if he’s back in, then I predict chaos on the horizon, along with high pressure zones and very bad weather.

@17 Accepting the invitation…all it takes is links and clicks ;-)

Spoiler alert: Not a family site.

Santorum

@18 I thought those were his “This is a napkin” air quotes.

Sophie@20: Nah, the fingers do look like they are hooked into claws.
Sorta the way lil Bobby Jindal does. Hmmm…is this a Republican thing?

http://colorlines.com/assets_c/2012/04/jindal_041812-thumb-640xauto-5862.jpg

http://media.nola.com/politics/photo/bobby-jindal-legislaturejpg-7caf6e2577f39c24_large.jpg

@20 – shades of the Amazing Kreskin – I didn’t think about that. Etiquette lessons or magic shadows – inquiring minds want to know.

My fave lil bobby picture.

Uh-oh…I must have done a Jindal overload. :-(

Thanks for this post Fredster! Agree with how you connect the dots. I was hoping this nut would fade away and take care of his family…I’m such a sap! He’s as power mad as the other nutcases.

Oh socal…he’s seriously out to lunch because he believes his own sh!t and thinks others will too.

It’s particularly scary when they begin to believe themselves.

chat@27: Oh indeed!! Sorta like Howard Beale.

They threw this A Hole out of his own state. It’s just amazing how delusional a religious crackpot loser can actually become. There is no better example than Rick Santorum (R-Vatican).

Upps@29: Touche’ madame!!

Comments are closed.

Wanna Be A Widdershin?

Send us a sample post at:

widdershinssubmissions at gmail dot com

Our Front-Pagers

Twittershins

Are You…Too Left/Liberal For Obama?

Blog Archive

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 159 other followers

%d bloggers like this: